Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 7, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Reversing.

• In December, 1911, the appellee was a passenger upon appellant’s train from Nashville, Tennessee, to Bowling Green, Kentucky. When she checked her trunk, appellant’s agent gave her a trunk check bearing this endorsement upon its back:

“It shall be the duty of every passenger tendering baggage for transportation to declare the value thereof without inquiry by the carrier or any agent or employee thereof. Unless a greater sum is declared by passenger according to the form prepared by checking carrier and charges paid for increased value at the time…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Hoke & Economides v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Washington Ex Rel. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. E. F. Elmberg Co. v. Dunlap Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Davis v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Adams Express Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Clark v. Southern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API