Legal Opinion
Groom v. Jarboe
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGbeenbebg, J.
Defendants appearing specially move to vacate service of summons, warrant of attachment and levy made thereunder, based upon the failure of the plaintiff administratrix to comply with section 905 of the Civil Practice Act and for insufficiency of the papers supporting the warrant.
The action was originally commenced by Leo Groom during his lifetime and a warrant of attachment was issued on April 19, 1946. The Sheriff of the City of New York, Kings County Division, made a levy thereunder on April 22,1946, upon funds due the defendants from the estate of James J. Healey.
Service of the summons…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blossom v. . EstesNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Miller Bros. Construction Co. v. Thew Shovel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- McCoy v. Erie Forge & Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- McCoy v. Erie Forge & Steel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Galbraith v. YancikNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- In re the Accounting of BatyiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948