State v. Whittington
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUNDS, Justice.
*187Before defendant’s trial for narcotics offenses, the State notified defendant that, pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes subsection 90-95(g), it intended to introduce a laboratory report of the results of a chemical analysis of the contraband without calling the testing chemist as a witness. At defendant’s trial, the report was admitted over defendant’s objection. The Court of Appeals reversed defendant’s conviction for trafficking in opium by possession, holding that the State failed to establish that defendant waived his constitutional right to confront the witnesses…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cmty. Success Initiative v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
- Farmer v. Troy Univ.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- Farmer v. Troy Univ.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- Farmer v. Troy Univ.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. KelliherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.