Legal Opinion

Alexander Butwinski v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 2, 1957No. 75, Docket 24670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The jury awarded plaintiff $75,000 for injuries he sustained in a collision while serving as a floatman aboard defendant’s tug. Defendant seeks a new trial on the following grounds: (1) Medical expenses included in the verdict were not recoverable in an action brought under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688; (2) the court improperly confused unseaworthiness and negligence in its charge; (3) the court abused its discretion in permitting plaintiff’s doctor to be recalled as a witness; (4) there was insufficient probative evidence upon which to calculate loss of future earnings; and (5) the verdict…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arthur J. Ferguson v. Alice PostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. Herbert Butler, James Wilmoll, Richard Martelli, Bruce Roys, William Shiland, Harold Frederickson and Bruno Kapner v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. San Ore Construction CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1969
  2. Saleeby v. Kingsway Tankers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  3. Knieling v. Fung Fook and PostonDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API