Legal Opinion

Wagg's v. Gibbons

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In error to the District Court of Washington county. The material facts in this case are stated in the opinion of the court. The answer therein mentioned was/on demurrer in the court of common pleas, held to be a sufficient defense, and judgment was entered accordingly. The district court, on error, reversed this judgment of the common pleas; and the present petition in error seeks to reverse the judgment of reversal.

1Opinion of the CourtRanney, C. J.

The petition alleges that the plaintiff’s testator was married to Edwin Wagg sometime prior to the year 1849, in the kingdom of Great Britain, of which both parties were then citizens. That in May of that year she was abandoned by her husband, who left' Great Britain and went to Asia, and has never returned; and that he left her wholly without any means of support, and has *581ever since refused to make any provision therefor. In 1850 she came to this State, and has supported and. maintained herself, and dealt as a single woman ; and that in 1854 it came to her knowledge that her husband was in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gregory v. PaulMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State ex. rel. Richards v. ArmstrongUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Braithwaite v. AikinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Danner v. BertholdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Mayhugh v. RosenthalOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API