Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Gillespie

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 19, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00322Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PHIL SAMPSON, representative of the No. 1:20-cv-00322-DAD-SAB Estate and Heirs of Dr. Lauren Sampson, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FRESNO POLICE OFFICERS, 15 GILLESPIE, KRAMER AND COOPER; (Doc. No. 6) CITY OF FRESNO and DOES 1 to 20, 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 6) to dismiss plaintiff’s 20 complaint. (Doc. No. 1-1.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Trevino v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. James Gillette v. Duane Delmore, and City of EugeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API