Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Winston

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

In this case a motion for a new trial is made by plaintiff. Defendants were contractors excavating a tunnel through a hill in the northern part of the city of St. Paul, in this district. It was a face cut. One side of the hill was a little higher than the other, where the excavation- was made. It appeared from the testimony that the contractor worked night and day gangs. The plaintiff was an employe in the night gang, under a foreman, and brings this suit to recover damages from a personal injury suffered, as charged from the negligence of the defendants. This cut was through a hill which was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Christienson v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Brown v. People's Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  3. Allen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Carlson v. Sioux Falls Water Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Carlson v. Sioux Falls Water Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API