Anderson v. Winston
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
At Law.
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
In this case a motion for a new trial is made by plaintiff. Defendants were contractors excavating a tunnel through a hill in the northern part of the city of St. Paul, in this district. It was a face cut. One side of the hill was a little higher than the other, where the excavation- was made. It appeared from the testimony that the contractor worked night and day gangs. The plaintiff was an employe in the night gang, under a foreman, and brings this suit to recover damages from a personal injury suffered, as charged from the negligence of the defendants. This cut was through a hill which was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- Christienson v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1903
- Brown v. People's Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1908
- Allen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1894
- Carlson v. Sioux Falls Water Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Carlson v. Sioux Falls Water Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.