Legal Opinion
United States v. Kelly Donald Gould
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 18, 2003No. 02-30629PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc "with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Seth A. Becker, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Tidewater, Inc., Tidewater Incorporated, Twenty Grand Offshore Incorporated, Tidewater Marine, L.L.C., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Intervenor Defendants-Appellees-Appellants, R&b Falcon Drilling Usa, Inc., Pental Insurance Company, Ltd., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Insurance Co., Hydra Rig, a Division of Tuboscope Vetco International, L.P., Defendant-Third Party Defendant-Third Party Hydradyne Hydraulics, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Coflexip Stena Offshore, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Baker Hughes, Inc., Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., Defendants-Intervenor and Baker Oil Tools, Inc., a Division of Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., Defendant-Third Party Defendant-Intervenor Plaintiff-Third Party Baker Oil Tools, a Division of Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Kelly Donald GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Kelly Donald GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004