Legal Opinion
In Re Certain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 8, 1983No. 19-20175PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEBTOR’S APPLICATION 1 FOR RECOVERY OF PREFERENTIAL WAGE GARNISHMENT — CODE SECTIONS 547(b) AND 522(h)
ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
BACKGROUND
On August 27, 1982, the debtor filed a petition under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Prior to ninety days before the filing of the petition the creditor, Ethel Crescenzo (creditor), obtained a judgment against the debtor and caused a wage execution to be levied pursuant to Conn.Gen.Stat. § 52-361. 2
On her Schedule B-4, the debtor claimed an exemption of $820.73, representing wages garnished during the ninety days…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hackett v. Commercial Banking Corp. (In Re Hackett)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- In re SimsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
- England v. First National Bank of Bonham (In Re England)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carlsen v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Carlsen)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1986
- In re CoppieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- In Re MontgomeryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1987
- Tabita v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Tabita)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- In Re MitchellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.