Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of City Bank Farmers Trust Co.

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 5, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, S.

The issues raised by the objections to the account relate primarily to the problem of allocating estate taxes.

The special guardian has argued that his ward, the beneficiary of a Totten trust, *is under no obligation to contribute to the payment of the taxes on the ground that the bank account was improperly included in the taxable estate. This objection is overruled as “ The court is bound by the actual fact of inclusion or exclusion of property by the taxing authorities.” (Matter of Kaufman, 170 Misc. 436, 445.) The bank will be directed to pay the taxes apportioned to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. In Re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. In re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re the Accounting of BusheNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. In re the Estate of KaufmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WolfNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  2. In re the Accounting of DimondNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  3. In re the Accounting of GrossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API