Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Kramer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 2011No. 95791PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James J. Sweeney, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Laurel Thomas, individually and as executor of the estate of Craig Thomas, and MTI Computer Services, Inc., appeal the court’s granting of summary judgment to defendant-appellee Edward G. Kramer in this case alleging attorney misconduct. After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In 1992, Laurel and her husband Craig retained defendant, who is an attorney, to handle the legal end of purchasing MTI, a computer maintenance and service company. Defendant had previously represented Laurel in the 1980s in a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dottore v. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Pomeroy v. SchwartzOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Accelerated Sys. Integration Inc. v. Ritzler, Coughlin & Swansiger, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Gilbert v. Midland Funding, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Breen v. HochheiserOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API