Legal Opinion

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Renshaw

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1977No. D. D. No. 76-15PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Upon examination of the record of the hearing, we find that the violations with which respondent was ultimately charged were accurate and substantiated. *194We agree with the board’s conclusion that there were mitigating circumstances.*

We accept the board’s recommendation and the respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

The following facts were revealed at the hearing before the board:(1) Respondent voluntarily returned approximately one-half of his fee as a fiduciary…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SigallOhio Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API