Legal Opinion

Fliashnick v. Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Bernard Fliashnick, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 31st day of March, 1916, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the New York Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

In an action in the Municipal Court, Second District, borough of Bronx, in which Catherine Hagmayer was plaintiff and the Novelty Stamp Company was defendant, the plaintiff discontinued, and the costs were taxed. These costs, amounting to sixty-eight dollars and seventy-five cents, were deposited with the clerk of the said Municipal Court, Second District. This plaintiff was the attorney for the defendant in that action, and seeks in this action to have those costs applied to the satisfacti >n of his lien thereupon. The defendant, The New York Edison Company, defends the action upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Webb v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Agricultural Insurance v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spinello v. SpinelloNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Atom Foreign Auto Parts, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lopez v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Orth v. Service Fire InsuranceSuffolk County District Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API