Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Black

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson Connty. — John Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The hill in the present case was filed to recover of defendant damages for breach of a general covenant of warranty, and against incumbrances, contained in a deed which defendant made to complainant on October *36214,1911, for certain land lying in East Nashville on the bank of Cumberland river, just north of the Woodland street bridge. - The action is based on the fact that, when the deed was made, there were two railway tracks and rights of way on the lot as follows: The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company owned a track and right of way running across the lot in a diagonal direction, thence…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Huyck v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Kellogg v. MalinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Wadhams v. SwanIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Kutz v. McCuneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Janes v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  2. Rogers v. BattleTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Vaughan v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API