Legal Opinion

In Re Tardugno

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 9, 2001No. 19-40289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEBTORS’ AMENDED CLAIM OF EXEMPTIONS AND DEBTORS’ MOTION TO AVOID JUDICIAL LIEN

JOEL B. ROSENTHAL, Bankruptcy Judge.

The parties appeared for hearing on the Debtors’ Amended Claim of Exemptions, the objections of Doyle Lumber Co., Inc. (“Doyle”) and the Trustee thereto, and the Debtors’ Motion to Avoid Judicial Lien. The Debtors seek to avoid Doyle’s judicial hen on their residence (“the Property”). The Trustee and Doyle object to the amount of equity the Debtors claim as exempt pursuant to § 1 of Chapter 188 of the Massachusetts General Laws. Resolution of the former…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Patriot Portfolio, LLC v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Turner v. GreenawayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shamban v. PerryBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2006
  2. In Re MarianoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API