Legal Opinion

Raker v. DEC International

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1996No. Docket 178000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an August 3, 1994, order of the Ingham Circuit Court granting defendants summary disposition on the basis that plaintiffs’ claim for breach of implied warranty of merchantability was untimely under the four-year period of limitation provided in the Uniform Commer cial Code, MCL 440.2725; MSA 19.2725. We reverse and remand the case to the trial court.

On May 11, 1989, plaintiffs, commercial dairy farmers, entered into a contract with Tri County Dairy Equipment, Inc., for the purchase of a milking system. The component parts were purchased from DEC…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Long Island Lighting Co. v. Transamerica Delaval, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Ontario Hydro v. Zallea Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
  5. Dreier Co., Inc. v. Unitronix Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baker v. Dec InternationalMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Federated Ins. Co. v. OAKLAND CTY. RD. COM'NMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Federated Insurance v. Oakland County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Baker v. Dec InternationalMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Jody Pohlman v. James G PohlmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API