Legal Opinion
Secallus v. Muscarelle
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 31, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 245 N.J.Super. 535, 586 A.2d 305 (1991).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, and STEIN — 7.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Secallus v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stevenson v. Keene Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Vitty v. DCP CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993