Legal Opinion

Breiterman v. Elmar Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 1986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for moneys allegedly due under certain promissory notes, the defendant Elmar Properties, Inc. (hereinafter Elmar) and the proposed intervenor Frank De Palma (hereinafter De Palma) appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated November 12, 1985, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint and granted a hearing to assess damages, and denied their cross motion to (1) dismiss the action on the ground that an action had been filed in Federal court (CPLR 3211 [a] [4]) and (2) allow De Palma to intervene as a party…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. New Castle Siding Co. v. WolfsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. New Castle Siding Co. v. WolfsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pittman v. MISSISSIPPI PSCMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Layden v. BoccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Harris v. Stony Clove Lake Acres, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Malankara Archdiocese of Syrian Orthodox Church in North America v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Gutman v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API