Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Holmes

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1981Published

1DissentMeyer, J.

The majority ignores the long-settled rules that whether legislation is permissive or mandatory is to be determined not only from the language of the statute, but also from the circumstances surrounding its passage and the object sought to be accomplished, and that permissive words conferring power and authority upon public officers or bodies will generally be held mandatory when the act authorized concerns either the public interest or the rights of individuals (People ex rel. Otsego County *979Bank v Board of Supervisors of Otsego County, 51 NY 401, 405; People ex rel. Conway v Board of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Otsego County Bank v. Board of Supervisors of Otsego CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. People Ex Rel. Doscher v. . SissonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. People Ex Rel. Conway v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. People Ex Rel. Reynolds v. . Common CouncilNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Treherne-Thomas v. Treherne-ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API