Commerce Finance Co. v. Perry
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. The allegations of the affidavit of illegality were sufficient, as against a motion to strike in the nature of a general demurrer, to sustain the contention that the plaintiff in fi. fa. was not a bona fide purchaser for value.
2. The motion to strike, in the nature of a general demurrer, should have been sustained, because (a) the allegations of fraud were insufficient as a matter of law, in that they were too general; (b) payments made with knowledge of all the facts are voluntary, and can not be recovered; (c) the execution of a note or written contract in renewal of a former contract…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Stoddard Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & AverySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- American Car Co. v. Atlanta Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Energy & Process Corp. v. Jim Dally & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Greenbriar Shopping CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- Newkirk v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Sewell v. Peoples Loan & Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Thomas v. Adrian Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964