Legal Opinion

Commerce Finance Co. v. Perry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1942No. 29527PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. The allegations of the affidavit of illegality were sufficient, as against a motion to strike in the nature of a general demurrer, to sustain the contention that the plaintiff in fi. fa. was not a bona fide purchaser for value.

2. The motion to strike, in the nature of a general demurrer, should have been sustained, because (a) the allegations of fraud were insufficient as a matter of law, in that they were too general; (b) payments made with knowledge of all the facts are voluntary, and can not be recovered; (c) the execution of a note or written contract in renewal of a former contract…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Stoddard Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & AverySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. American Car Co. v. Atlanta Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Energy & Process Corp. v. Jim Dally & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Greenbriar Shopping CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
  3. Newkirk v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Sewell v. Peoples Loan & Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Thomas v. Adrian Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API