Simmons v. Biggs
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Insurance Money. This is a controversy submitted without action in compliance with § 567 et seq of The Code, and heard before Philips, J., at September Term, 1887, of MahtiN Superior Court, upon the following facts as a “ case agreed.” , “ 1. Hardy W. Mizzell and Annie M., defendant’s intestate, were married in the year 1866. “ 2. That during the life of the said Hardy W. Mizzell he took out the following policies of insurance on his own life in manner and form as follows':…
Read the full summary
Insurance Money. This is a controversy submitted without action in compliance with § 567 et seq of The Code, and heard before Philips, J., at September Term, 1887, of MahtiN Superior Court, upon the following facts as a “ case agreed.” , “ 1. Hardy W. Mizzell and Annie M., defendant’s intestate, were married in the year 1866. “ 2. That during the life of the said Hardy W. Mizzell he took out the following policies of insurance on his own life in manner and form as follows': One for $3,000 in the .¿Etna Life Insurance Company of New York, payable to his wife Annie M. and their children ; one…
1Opinion of the CourtDav-is, J.
This case is in principle like that of Conigland v. Smith, 79 N. C., 303, and following the decision made in that case, there was no error in the judgment of the Court below.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Conigland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lanier v. Insurance Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Jones v. PattyMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
- Pippen v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Fish v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904