Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McGuire v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 13, 1984No. 84-648Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarkett, Judge

I agree with the majority in certifying the question. However, I respectfully dissent with the majority view on the merits and would grant the petition for rehearing. I believe the pertinent administrative code provision to be unconstitutionally vague. Because a conviction under an unconstitutional law constitutes fundamental error, a fortiori, it is a departure from the essential requirements of law and certiorari is the appropriate remedy. Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93 (Fla.1983).

The defendant in this case was convicted pursuant to Rule 16D-2.04(l)(e), Florida Administrative Code, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Combs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. City of Cincinnati v. WayneOhio Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API