Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kennecott Copper Corp. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1980No. 3942Published

1DissentAndrews, Judge

I dissent.

While I agree with most of the majority opinion, in my view the regulation subject to review here should be set aside. For two separate reasons, I consider New Mexico Air Quality Control Regulation 652 limiting sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from existing copper smelters, to be not in accordance with law. Section 74-1-9 1(3), N.M.S.A. 1978.

The Air Quality Control Act directs the Board to consider the “economic value of the sources and subjects of air contaminants” and the “economic reasonableness of reducing or eliminating air contaminants from the sources involved.” Section 74-2-5…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New Mexico Municipal League, Inc. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Public Service Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Holloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API