Legal Opinion

Griffith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The City of New York, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Richmond on the 13th day of February, 1902, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Richmond Trial Term before the court without a jury-

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J. :

In this action, tried before the court without a jury, the following facts were found : The defendant, by the Greater Hew York charter (Laws of 1897, chap. 378), which took effect January 1, 1898, has become liable for the legal obligations of the village of Port Richmond. Between September 1 and December 30, 1897, one Humphreys was employed by the board of health of said village as clerk to the board at a salary of $75 per month, and the board of trustees, on December thirtieth and thirty-first, audited and allowed the claim and issued and delivered to Humphreys warrants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Taxpayers of PlattsburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Kent v. Village of North TarrytownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. President of the Village of OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Reynolds v. President & Trustees of the Village of OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API