White v. White
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 104, Jan. T./1901, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., Dec. T., 1899, No. 24, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Lizzie White v. Henry S. White, Francis R. White, Lizzie White, Executors of Jonas White. Assumpsit on a bond. Before Landis, J. The court charged as follows : This is an action to recover the sum of $2,700 with interest.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 104, Jan. T./1901, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., Dec. T., 1899, No. 24, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Lizzie White v. Henry S. White, Francis R. White, Lizzie White, Executors of Jonas White. Assumpsit on a bond. Before Landis, J. The court charged as follows : This is an action to recover the sum of $2,700 with interest. The foundation of the suit is a common bond, under seal, dated only 1879, without day or date, but payable April 1, 1879, with interest at the rate of three per cent per annum. The suit was brought December 5, 1899, and, therefore,…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We are satisfied from our examination of the testimony in this case that it was for the consideration of the jury, and if credited by them it was sufficient to overcome the presumption of payment. The case was carefully submitted to the jury under instructions which were unobjectionable. We find no error in either of the specifications and we therefore affirm the judgment entered on the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Grenet's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Sheafer v. WoodsideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- O'Hara v. CorrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904