Legal Opinion
Di Fatta v. Campagna
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1966No. 2100PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASEZ, Judge.
This is a suit for the balance due on a promissory note.
On October 30, 1961, plaintiff, Santo Di Fatta, made a loan to the defendants, Ronald F. Campagna and his father, Frank Campagna, in order that they might operate a bar and cocktail lounge. A demand note payable to the order of bearer in the-amount of Twenty-Two Thousand and no/100 ($22,000) Dollars, with interest at 8% per annum from date until paid, was *159signed by the defendant, Ronald F. Cam-pagna, as maker, and defendant, Frank Campagna, as endorser. The note was secured by a chattel mortgage on fixtures and equipment in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Calatex Oil & Gas Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Bedsole v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hammond Finance Co. v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SchumacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- White System of New Orleans, Inc. v. LehmannLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bank of Coushatta v. DryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Lake Charles Fire Fighters Ass'n Local Union No. 561 v. City of Lake CharlesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Difatta v. CampagnaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966