Legal Opinion

State v. Roy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1950No. 39886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Defendant, Nathan Roy, is appealing from his conviction of the crime of theft of property valued at $75 and from the imposed sentence of two years at hard labor in the State Penitentiary.

During the course of the trial defense counsel reserved numerous bills of exceptions; but none was perfected. The bills were not presented to the district judge (as he explains in a per curiam) until after the granting of the order of appeal and, as-a consequence, he refused to sign them. In view of these circumstances we are unable to pass upon the objections noted in the reserved bills.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BordeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  2. State v. CalvinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. State v. McLeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  4. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. State v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  3. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API