Pilson v. Guillery
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Plaintiff brought an action on certain promissory notes against the makers Leo Guillery and Bertha Guillery. When they signed the notes the defendants were husband and wife. Later, when suit was filed they had been divorced. Bertha Guillery defended by claiming the benefit of the provision of Article XI, section 1, of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A., which renders the separate property of a married woman unavailable for application on the debts of her husband “without her consent given by some instrument in writing executed according to the law respecting conveyances by married women”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jette v. HarbisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- FIRST NATL. BANK OF MELBOURNE v. BergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Kovens v. BluestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Angle v. CrowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Waechter v. General Mills, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- American National Bank of Jacksonville v. BrantleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. PlayfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Turek v. First National Bank at OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969