Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Easton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

This action is brought under R. L. c. 48, § 104, against the town of Easton to recover the penalty therein provided for the failure of its road commissioners to erect permanent bounds at the termini and angles of Center Street in said town, as relocated and widened by them. The statute reads as follows : “ The county commissioners, mayor and aldermen, selectmen or road commissioners, shall cause permanent bounds to be erected at the termini and angles of all ways laid out by them. Such bounds shall be of stone, not less than three feet long, two feet of which at least shall be set in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Worcester & Nashua RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Libby v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Beloin v. BullettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API