Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Francois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 16, 2009Published

1DissentCatterson, J.

Because I believe that the police forcibly stopped and detained the defendant without a reasonable suspicion that the defendant had committed or was about to commit an offense, I dissent. Initially, I agree with the motion court and the majority that police had a founded suspicion of criminality based on the defendant’s furtive behavior at the MetroCard machine. In my view, this founded suspicion merely allowed the police to pursue a common-law right to inquire what the defendant was doing at the MetroCard machine. (People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223-224 [1976].)

Where I depart from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. BoraNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. GrunwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. StevensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API