Legal Opinion

Sovik v. Sovik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Special Term, which denied plaintiff’s motion to serve a supplemental complaint in a divorce action. The proposed supplemental complaint sets forth acts of adultery which are said to have occurred after the commencement of the action. We think the Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the application. The possible avoidance of two actions and the ends of justice will be better served by the granting of the application. Order reversed, on the law and facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and motion granted.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herzog v. HerzogNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fitzpatrick v. FitzpatrickNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Taplinger v. TaplingerNew York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API