Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Police Court of Sacramento
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White
By ordinance the City of Sacramento provides: “every person, firm, or corporation owning, controlling or operating any street railroad, suburban railroad, or interurban railroad upon and along any of the streets, of the City of Sacramento shrill, without cost to the city during the months of June, July, August, September and October, of each year, and at such other times as may be necessary to keep the dust laid, sprinkle with water the surface of the street, occupied by such railroad, between the rails and tracks and for a sufficient distance beyond the outermost rails thereof, so as to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Newcomb v. Norfolk Western Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- City & Suburban Railway Co. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- City of St. Paul v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Cougar Business Owners Ass'n v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- January Littlejohn v. School Board of Leon County FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
- Durham Public Service Co. v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.