Legal Opinion

Uy v. Shapmor, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 28, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The submission of this case to the jury by the court on the theory of res ipsa loquitur as against the defendant-appellant was proper and the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff might well be sustained. (Day v. Grand Union Co., 280 App. Div. 253, affd. 304 N. Y. 821; Hyams v. King Kullen Grocery Co., 230 N. Y. S. 2d 962, revg..in part 32 Misc 2d 920, affd. 20 A D 2d 657.) However, the statement of the plaintiff, while being questioned by counsel for the codefendant, now defendant-respondent, namely, “I reported it to the manager who took my name and he said, ‘ The insurance man would…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simpson v. . Foundation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Day v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Day v. Grand Union Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Hyams v. King Kullen Grocery Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API