Uy v. Shapmor, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
The submission of this case to the jury by the court on the theory of res ipsa loquitur as against the defendant-appellant was proper and the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff might well be sustained. (Day v. Grand Union Co., 280 App. Div. 253, affd. 304 N. Y. 821; Hyams v. King Kullen Grocery Co., 230 N. Y. S. 2d 962, revg..in part 32 Misc 2d 920, affd. 20 A D 2d 657.) However, the statement of the plaintiff, while being questioned by counsel for the codefendant, now defendant-respondent, namely, “I reported it to the manager who took my name and he said, ‘ The insurance man would…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Simpson v. . Foundation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Day v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Day v. Grand Union Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Hyams v. King Kullen Grocery Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1961
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973