Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1994No. 14820PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is the propriety of dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus without affording the petitioner an opportunity to present evidence in support of his claims for relief. The petitioner, Eugene Mercer, filed an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his conviction of felony murder pursuant to Gen*90eral Statutes (Rev. to 1983) § 53a-54c1 should be set aside because of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. The habeas court dismissed the petition but granted the petitioner certification to appeal. A divided Appellate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Valeriano v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Diaz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Mitchell v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Mejia v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Boria v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API