People v. Modica
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum."
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified and the case remitted to Supreme Court for resentence and, as so modified, should be affirmed.
The voluntariness of defendant’s plea involves a mixed question of law and fact beyond the review powers of this court (People v Harrison, 57 NY2d 470, 477). Moreover, the mistake of counsel with respect to minimum sentence does not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel, the test being “reasonable competence”, not perfect representation (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137,146), there being no question…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by63 opinions
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- The People v. Christopher A. NicholsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. OathoutNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- The People v. Anthony v. PavoneNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.