Legal Opinion · Dissent

Griffin Development Co. v. City of Oxnard

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1985No. L.A. 31930Published

1DissentMosk, J.

I dissent.

Under the ordinance of the City of Oxnard, the American dream of home ownership has become a nightmare: the city has placed unreasonable barriers in the way of those frugal families who prefer at the end of the year to have an enhanced equity in a piece of real property instead of 12 rent receipts.

To the city fathers of Oxnard the condominium apparently represents a sinister concept, rather than an increasingly popular form of home ownership. The result of this phobia is the ordinance at issue, purportedly regulatory, but conceded by the city attorney at oral argument to be…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API