Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sharp

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 4, 1937No. 6203PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

There are two petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, one by the Commissioner and the other by the taxpayer in the nature of cross-appeals. They were argued together but it will contribute to clarity to dispose of them separately. The taxpayer is the estate of Walter P. Sharp, deceased. His executors returned as his taxable estate property the assessed tax upon which was $9,855.58. The controversy here presented began with a notice from the Commissioner under section 308 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 75) of a tax deficiency claim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. PENNSYLVANIA CO., ETC. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Noble Co. v. The C. S. Johnson CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  2. Flick's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  3. Golden v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Andy Mohan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API