West v. Berg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Polk county, Ives, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action by the plaintiff, as constable, to-recover from the defendant a quantity of grain which, he alleges, the defendant unlawfully took and carried away while he was holding it by virtue of a levy thereon, under a writ of attachment duly issued out of a justice court, in an action therein pending, delivered to him for service and duly levied by him on the grain. A portion of the grain was in the shock, and the balance uncut, at the time the plaintiff claims to have levied upon it. The levy was made on August 29r *2881895, by filing- a certified copy of tbe writ and tbe return of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. StaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Smith v. VictorinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Barker v. KelderhouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
- Adams v. SpeelmanNew York Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gillette-Herzog Manufacturing Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Nohre v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Caley v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Troy v. RodgersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910