Legal Opinion

Hammack v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2002No. ED 79986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Joseph Hammack (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant was charged with first degree trafficking of methamphetamine in violation of section 195.222 RSMo 20001 and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of section 195.233. In addition, he was charged with possession of acetone with intent to process methamphetamine and possession of iodine with intent to process methamphetamine, both in violation of section 195.420. Movant entered an Alford2 plea to all…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hammack v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API