Legal Opinion

Aspen v. Bayless

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 15, 1989No. 89-00647PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

552 So.2d 298 (1989)

Karen Jeanne Smolic ASPEN, F/K/a Karen Jeanne Smolic, Appellant,

v.

Brooke T. BAYLESS, Appellee.

No. 89-00647.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 15, 1989.

H. Shelton Phillips of Kaleel and Kaleel, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

T. Philip Hanson, Jr. of Greenfelder, Mander, Hanson and Murphy, Dade City, for appellee.

RYDER, Judge.

Appellant, who was the defendant below, seeks review of the trial court's denial of her motion to tax costs. We affirm, but we certify the question raised in this case as being of great public importance.

Appellee filed an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida Bar Re: Amendment to Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1.442Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Santiesteban v. McGrathDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. City of Boca Raton v. Boca Villas Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Turner v. DNE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Lafferty v. TennantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aspen v. BaylessSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Williams v. BrochuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Hough v. HuffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Hart v. City of GrovelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Luizza v. YaegerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API