Legal Opinion · Dissent

De Stubner v. Microid Process, Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1942No. 9288Published

1Dissent

Fox, President,

dissenting in part, concurring in part:

I concur in that part of the opinion of the majority which, in effect, restores to the plaintiff below all patents in the field of color pigments, and s'áves to the United Carbon Company, Inc., its exclusive right to exploit black pigments, under its license of July 31, 1936. I dissent from that part of the said opinion which cancels and rescinds the agreement of the same date, between plaintiff and Microid Process, Inc., subject only to the rights of the United Carbon Company, Inc., to use and exploit black pigments, and which requires…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Veazie v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Boyd v. DunlapNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  4. McGhee v. BellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. Craig v. HukillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API