Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Windham

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1987No. A031334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MERRILL, J.

An amended information was filed charging appellants Jeffrey Windham and Carl Wilson with robbery (Pen. Code, 1 §211) in count one and with receiving, concealing and withholding stolen property (§ 496, subd. 1) in count two. In addition, Wilson was charged with possession of a sawed-off shotgun (§ 12020) in count three and Windham was charged with vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10851) in count four. The amended information also contained the following enhancement allegations: that Wilson used a rifle in the commission of the robbery (§ 12022.5) and that Windham was armed with a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. People v. LassiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Moore v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. People v. CrosbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API