Legal Opinion

State v. Adler

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 13, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

In July 1988 the State filed a petition to revoke the probation of Seymour Harold Adler (“Appellant”), a fugitive. Appellant was taken into federal custody in May 1990 and was stdl in federal custody in January 1995, when his probation was revoked in this case. The issue on appeal is whether the delay in revoking Appedant’s probation was so unreasonable and prejudicial that it violated his constitutional right to due process of *573law. The trial court found no such violation, and we affirm.

I

Appellant headed a precious-metals investment swindle that defrauded Arizona victims…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. FlemmingArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BlyArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Padilla v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AdlerArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. AdlerArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. AdlerArizona Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API