Legal Opinion

United States v. Campestrini

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided January 22, 2014No. Criminal No. 13-280 FABPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BESOSA, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendants Diego Campestrini and Cell Tech Electronics, Inc. (“Cell Tech”)’s motion to transfer venue pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 21(b) (“Rule 21(b)”). (Docket No. 19.) Having considered defendants’ motion, the government’s response, (Docket No. 22), and defendants’ reply, (Docket No. 24), the Court GRANTS the transfer of venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

I. Parties’ Arguments

Defendants argue that their trial should be transferred to the Southern District of Florida pursuant to Rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. Flores-MachicoteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. MuratoskiDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MenendezDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API