Legal Opinion
Reed v. Caulfield
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 26, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2053 (PLF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court to determine whether a certificate of appealability is warranted. The Court denied petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus by Memorandum Opinion and Order of October 16, 2009. See Reed v. Caulfield, Civil Action No. 09-2053, Memorandum Opinion and Order (D.D.C. Oct. 16, 2009). Petitioner appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The court of appeals is holding petitioner’s matter in abeyance pending notification from this Court of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Johnny Dickerson v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bolton v. AllenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ciacci v. HoganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012