Legal Opinion

International Patents Development Co. v. Penick & Ford, Ltd.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 30, 1936No. 654PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NTELDS, District Judge.

This is a patent suit charging defendant with infringement of three patents for the production of grape sugar. Grape sugar, corn sugar, dextrose, and dextrose hydrate are terms used interchangeably to describe the product of the patents. The defenses are invalidity, noninfringement, license, and estoppel.

The first, patent, No. 1,471,347, granted October 23, 1923, to William B. New-kirk, assignor to Corn Products Refining Company, for a “Method of Making Grape Sugar,” is a process patent. The second patent, No. 1,508,569, dated September 16, 1924, to Newkirk, assignor to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Masonite Corp. v. Celotex Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
  2. Bemis v. Charles A. Stevens & Bros.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penick & Ford v. International Patents Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API