Legal Opinion

United States v. Marcus

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 21, 1994No. Crim. PJM 93-0286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MESSITTE, District Judge.

I

In this ease, joining the nearly unanimous opinion of courts that have spoken to the issue, the Court holds that a prosecutor’s use of a wired informant for the purpose of recording conversations with the represented target of a criminal investigation, even to the point of suggesting topics to be discussed, does not violate professional disciplinary rules. Accordingly, the Court denies the motions of the several Defendants to suppress certain wire recordings.

II

In the late 1980s, Congress launched an investigation into reported widespread abuses in the generic…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert B. Sutton, United States of America v. Mark A. SucherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Michael Lemonakis, United States of America v. Paul EntenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. (Under Seal)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  5. United States v. George Edward Killian, United States of America v. George Edward Killian and Robert BrunkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Joseph Binder Schweizer Emplem Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API