Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schroeder Ex Rel. Schroeder v. Horack

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 6, 1979No. 60828Published

1DissentRendlen, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would hold the contract of insurance between Horack and Allstate Insurance Company was in effect May 11, 1974, the date of James Horack, Jr.’s accident with plaintiff Robert Schroeder because neither Schroeder nor Allstate had effectively terminated the contract pri- or to the time of the casualty.

The controlling fact is the language of paragraph 20 of the liability policy issued by Allstate which provides:

CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL COVERAGE

20. CANCELLATION

[1] This policy may be cancelled by the named insured by mailing to the company written notice stating when…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Soukup v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. Southwest Baptist College, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Packard Manufacturing Co. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Dyche v. BostianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Hayes v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API