Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bank of New York Mellon v. Slavin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 2017No. 524426Published

1DissentAarons, J.

I respectfully dissent. In my view, plaintiff had six months from January 2013—when Supreme Court (McDonough, J.) dismissed plaintiff’s first action based upon its failure to appear at a mandatory conference—to recommence this action. Because plaintiff did not recommence this action until August 2015, the action is untimely. Accordingly, Supreme Court (Zwack, J.) properly denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted the cross motion for summary judgment by defendant Erin Slavin (hereinafter defendant).

In October 2006, plaintiff commenced a mortgage foreclosure action…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Lew Morris Demolition Co. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Andrea v. Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. EitaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Malay v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API