Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Treleven

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

The trial court failed to make findings of fact as required by the statute, and were there any substantial conflict in the evidence we would send the case back.for a finding of facts. It is a case where different inferences may be drawn from the evidence rather than a conflict therein. The opinion of the trial court aids us in determining what it found as facts, but it should clearly be borne in mind by trial courts that the statute as to findings of fact is not satisfied by an opinion.

A careful scrutiny of the evidence satisfies us that the trial court was correct as to the question of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rinzel v. StumpfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Hansen Storage Co. v. BoddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. E. M. Fish Co. v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Brobst v. MartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. La Crosse Super Auto Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Shields v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Coolidge v. RuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hartberg v. American Founders Securities Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Old Line Life Insurance Co. of America v. HawnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API